He is the last to vote "not guilty"; played by Lee J. If found guilty, the boy will receive a death sentence. Jurors 3, 4 and Outraged at how the proceedings have gone, Juror 10 goes into a rage on why people from the slums cannot be trusted, of how they are little better than animals who gleefully kill each other off for fun.
The film ends when the friendly Jurors 8 Davis and 9 McCardle exchange names, and all of the jurors descend the courthouse steps to return to their individual lives Weiler of The New York Times wrote, "It makes for taut, absorbing, and compelling drama that reaches far beyond the close confines of its jury room setting.
Juror 5 Jack Klugmanlike the defendant a product of "the Twlve angry men hopes that his guilty vote will distance himself from his past. Confused and disturbed by this reaction to his diatribe, Juror 10 continues in a steadily fading voice and manner, slowing to a stop with "Listen to me.
He proposes that he will abstain from voting, and if the other 11 jurors are still unanimous in a guilty vote, then he will acquiesce to their decision.
He is the only juror to change his vote more than once during deliberations, initially voting "guilty", and changing three times. After he points this out, Jurors 12, 10 and 4 all change their vote to "not guilty".
Juror 11, an immigrant who has repeatedly displayed strong patriotic pride, presses Juror 7 hard about using his vote frivolously, and eventually Juror 7 admits that he now truly believes the defendant is not guilty.
He is the seventh to vote "not guilty". Jurors 5, 6 and 8 question whether this is true, as the witness in question had had a stroke, limiting his ability to walk.
Jurors 12 and 1 then change their votes, leaving only three dissenters: A rational, unflappable, self-assured and analytical stock broker who is concerned only with the facts, and is appalled by the bigotry of Juror Juror 12 then reverts his vote, making the vote 8—4. Lumet stated that his intention in using these techniques with cinematographer Boris Kaufman was to create a nearly palpable claustrophobia.
A wisecracking, indecisive advertising executive. Synopsis In a New York City courthouse, an eighteen-year-old boy from a slum is on trial for allegedly stabbing his father to death.
His speech offends Juror 5, who turns his back to him, and one by one the rest of the jurors start turning away from him. Juror 3 Lee J. Juror 8 cannily asks Juror 4 if he wears his eyeglasses to sleep, and Juror 4 admits that he does not wear them nobody does.
He is the second to vote "not guilty". A garage owner; a pushy and loud-mouthed bigot. Juror 2 questions the likelihood that the boy, who was almost a foot shorter than his father, could have inflicted the downward stab wound found in the body. The jury retires to a private room, where the jurors spend a short while getting acquainted before they begin deliberating.
This earns intense criticism from Juror 3 Lee J. An architect and the first to vote "not guilty". At the end of the film, he reveals to Juror 9 that his name is Davis, one of only two jurors to reveal his name; played by Henry Fonda.12 Angry Twlve angry men is a American courtroom drama film adapted from a teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose.
Written and co-produced by. Created Date: 3/29/ AM. 25 rows · Twelve Angry Men is a courtroom drama written by Reginald Rose. Twelve Angry Men. A Classic American Drama. Behind closed doors, tensions run high as a lone juror argues the innocence of a teenager accused of murder.
In this provocatively resonant American drama, 12 jurors from all strata of society revisit the evidence, debate the issue of reasonable doubt and confront each other's personal biases. Jul 29, · For many years, only the first half of the kinescope of the television version of "Twelve Angry Men" broadcast live on September 20, (Studio One in Hollywood: Twelve Angry Men ()) was thought to survive, and had been in the possession of the Museum of Television and Radio since /10(K).
"12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury's deliberations in a capital murder case. A man jury is sent to begin deliberations in the first-degree murder trial of an year-old man accused in the stabbing death of his father, where .Download